Battle erupted inside the Bitcoin neighborhood over BIP-110, and by March 2026, BIP-110 had change into one of the mentioned matters associated to main cryptocurrencies.
For these unfamiliar, BIP-110 is an enchancment to Bitcoin proposed by a developer below the pseudonym Dathon Ohm in December 2025 with the purpose of limiting the quantity of arbitrary information, photographs, and movies written to the blockchain by means of protocols akin to Ordinals and Runes.
Nevertheless, the best way to try this is by introducing a brief 12-month mushy fork to filter spam on the consensus degree.
Why Bitcoin Veterans Oppose BIP-110
An vital complication arises right here. Blockstream CEO Adam Again, who Satoshi Nakamoto himself talked about in his Bitcoin white paper, can be adamantly against BIP-110, together with different trade veterans akin to Jameson Lopp and Wang Chun.
Firstly, they cite threats to neutrality. Mr. Buck believes that makes an attempt to censor transaction varieties on the consensus degree are extra dangerous to the community than spam itself, and has actively fought towards spam.
The second is the danger of forfeiture. This proposal might make some current UTXOs unusable, which might successfully quantity to freezing consumer funds. Lastly, there’s a danger of community partitioning. Activating a mushy fork with out a tough consensus, utilizing the proposed threshold of 55% as an alternative of the standard 95%, might end result within the blockchain being break up into a number of branches.
Effectively, the issue is that 110 is an intentional literal downgrade. Your userspace will likely be corrupted. bip freezes utxos, breaks miniscript, disables OP_IF, and disables improve hooks. Non permanent mushy forks are additionally no good.
— Adam Again (@adam3us) March 15, 2026
Including gas to the controversy, one other well-known Bitcoiner with the nickname Hodlnaut accused Adam Again of being smug and ignoring protocol governance points.
BIP-110 will in all probability go down in historical past as a fantastic filter. If the community rejects it, Bitcoin will reaffirm its resistance to censorship. If accepted, BTC would take step one in direction of extra centralized governance, with the foundations doubtlessly altering relying on the prevailing agenda.
Leave a Reply